Elston
  • WHO WE ARE
    • About
    • Contact
    • Events
    • Press
  • WHAT WE DO
    • Portfolio Solutions >
      • Our Portfolios
      • Custom Portfolios
    • Fund Solutions >
      • Our Funds
      • Custom Funds
    • Index Solutions >
      • Our indices
      • Custom Indices
    • SPECIALIST STRATEGIES >
      • Money Market Funds
      • Retirement Income Solutions
      • Retirement Portfolios
      • Adaptive Portfolios
      • UK Equity Income
      • Multi-Asset Income
      • Liquid Real Assets
      • Dynamic Risk Parity
      • Gold and Precious Metals
      • Enabling Net Zero
    • Supporting Advisers >
      • Investment Committee Support
      • Regulatory Support
    • CPD
  • WHO WE HELP
    • Financial Advisers
    • Discretionary Managers
    • Fund Providers
  • Insights

Insights.

equity allocation: the dispersion game

24/8/2023

 
Picture
2022 was a reminder of the importance of dispersion within equity markets. It turns out this lesson remains relevant in 2023 but with very different - almost opposite - themes.
Click here to read the whole article

SECTOR INVESTING: an alternative approach to alpha generation

30/3/2023

 
Read the Citywire article

NAVIGATING SECTORS: TURBULENT FINANCIALS

30/3/2023

 
Picture
[5 min read, open as pdf]
  • Failure of SVB and Credit Suisse explored
  • Fears of systemic risk elevated
  • Reducing security-specific risk

Tracking the tremors

21/3/2023

 
Picture
[3 min read - open as pdf]
  • Banking sector problems are firm-specific
  • Higher rates and stickier inflation are biting
  • Financial conditions are tightening

FTSE past 8,000 reflects strong global sectors, not the UK economy

17/2/2023

 
Picture
[5 min read, open as pdf]

  • The FTSE 100, broke through 8,000 for the first time
  • This is good news for investors…
  • …but the index is less related to the UK economy

Sector dispersion creates a potential for alpha

27/1/2023

 
Picture
[5min read, open as pdf]
  • Equity markets can experience dislocation
  • This increases dispersion between sectors
  • Higher dispersion increases potential for sector-selection alpha
In the context of dislocation, different sectors will perform in different ways to adapt to the changing macro and market regime.

NMA PODCAST: INFLATION IS HERE TO STAY...

9/1/2023

 
Picture
NMA speaks to investment consultant Henry Cobbe about positioning equities for higher inflation using sector and factor equity investing.
Listen to the podcast

2023 OUTLOOK: LOOKING FOR LIGHT

16/12/2022

 
Picture
[5 min read]
  • Yield is back
  • Selectivity matters more
  • Inflation’s getting stickier
2022 proved to be a challenging year with pressure on equities and bonds a like in face of rising rates and soaring inflation.  In our 2023 Outlook: Looking for Light, we explore three key themes
1. Yield is back: for equities, bonds and alternatives - the yield drought is over
2. Selectivity matters more: within and across asset classes
3. Inflation is getting stickier: getting past the peak, but still a problem

Read the summary article

Find out more:
  • The full version of our 2023 Outlook report is available to our clients.  For UK advisers requesting further information, please contact us.
  • Watch the recent 2023 Outlook webinar discussion with Henry Cobbe, Hoshang Daroga (Elston) and Natasha Sarkaria, CAIA (BlackRock)

Alternative approaches to equity diversification

25/11/2022

 
Picture
[5 min read, open as pdf]
  • Regional equity allocation is starting to look dated
  • Sectors, factors and themes offer an alternative approach
  • These offer greater potential for returns dispersion
For full article, open as pdf

big tech derates - is this a good time to buy?

4/11/2022

 
Picture
[3 min read, open as pdf]
  • Big tech has dominated US equity indices in recent years​
  • Shares have deflated as economic outlook has deteriorated
  • How investors could allocate if they see a buying opportunity
​For full article, open as pdf


Sector role reversal: pandemic winners, today’s losers

3/6/2022

 
Picture
[5 min read, open as pdf]
​
  • Pandemic winners are suffering a fall from grace
  • Inflation risk is re-rating frothily valued sectors
  • Market uncertainty driving investors to dependable businesses
 
The uncertainty of the current market environment is prompting a pivot away from sectors that have served investors well, in many cases since the financial crisis but particularly during the Covid-19 pandemic. With inflation rampant, commodity prices spiralling, supply chains choked and the much relied-on ‘Fed Put’ (whereby central banks rescue markets by flooding them with liquidity) a thing of the past, investors are rotating away from Technology and Real Estate and into traditionally “boring”, but dependable sectors like Industrials, Materials and Energy. 

For full article, see pdf

2022 outlook: key themes

11/1/2022

 
Picture

[3 min read,  open as pdf]
​
  • Adapting portfolios for inflation
  • Income generation in a negative real yield world
  • Positioning portfolios for climate transition
 
2021 in review
Our 2021 market roundup summarises another strong year for markets in almost all asset classes except for Bonds which remain under pressure as interest rates are expected to rise and inflation ticks up.
Listed private equity (shares in private equity managers) performed best at +43.08%yy in GBP terms.  US was the best performing region at +30.06%.
Real asset exposures, such as Water, Commodities and Timber continued to rally in face of rising inflation risk, returning +32.81%, +28.22% and +17.66% respectively.

2022 outlook
We are continuing in this “curiouser, through-the-looking glass” world.  Traditionally you bought bonds for income, and equity for risk.  Now it’s the other way round.
Only equities provide income yields that have the potential to keep ahead of inflation.  Bonds carry increasing risk of loss in real terms as inflation and interest rates rise.
Real yields, which are bond yields less the inflation rate, are negative making traditional Bonds which aren’t linked to inflation highly unattractive.  Bonds that are linked to inflation are highly sensitive to rising interest rates (called duration risk), so are not attractive either.
How to navigate markets in this context?
The big three themes for the year ahead are, in our view:
  1. Adapting portfolios for inflation
  2. Income generation in a negative real yield world
  3. Positioning portfolios for climate transition
We explore each in turn, as well as reviewing updated Capital Market Assumptions for expected returns from different asset classes.

See full report in pdf
Attend our 2022 Outlook webinar

Fed up with cap-weighted indexes? Then don’t use them

12/1/2021

 
Picture
[5 min read, open as pdf]

  • Tech performance is skewing cap-weighted indices
  • Increased concentration reduces diversification
  • Using cap-weighted indices is an active choice
 
Tech performance is skewing cap-weighted indices
The run up in technology stocks and the inclusion of Tesla into the S&P500 has increased both sector concentration and security concentration.  The Top 10 has typically represented approximately 20% of the index, it now represents 27.4%. 
The chart below shows the Top 10 holdings weight over time.
Picture
Picture
​Rather than looking just at Risk vs Return, we also look at Beta vs Correlation to see to what extent each strategy has 1) not only reduced Beta relative to the market, but also 2) reduced Correlation (an indication of true diversification).  Strategies with lower Correlation have greater diversification effect from a portfolio construction perspective.
Ironically, the last time the index was anything close to being this concentrated was back in 1980 when IBM, AT&T and the big oil majors ruled the roost.

From a sector perspective, as at end December 2020, Information Technology now makes up 27.6% of the index.

Increased concentration reduces diversification
This level of concentration is indeed skewing indices that rely on a traditional market capitalisation-weighted (cap-weighted) methodology, and does therefore reduce diversification.
But the issue of the best performing stocks getting a larger weighting in the index, is not an accident of traditional index design.  It’s its very core.  Cap-weighted indices reflect the value placed on securities by investors, not the other way round.

We should not therefore conflate the debate around “active vs passive” investment approaches, with the debate around index methodology.

If portfolio managers are concerned about over-exposure to particular company or sector within a cap-weighted index, they can either chose an active, non-index fund, that is not a closet-tracker.  Or they can access the target asset class through an alternatively weighted index, which uses a security weighting scheme other than market capitalisation.

Using cap-weighted indices is an active choice
The decision to use a fund that tracks an cap-weighted index is an active choice.  And for those seeking differentiated exposure, there is a vast range of options available.

We categorise these into 3 sub-groups: Style, Factor-based and Risk-based.
  1. Style-based: for example: Value, Growth, Income.  This is the classical style-based approach.  Value investing traces back to Graham & Dodd’s research in the 1930s.
  2. Factor-based: for example: Value, Size, & Quality.  Factor-based investing weights securities by their internal fundamental characteristicss that relate to their expected drivers of returns: for example securities included in a Quality index would be included based on profitability and/or Return on Equity metrics.  Min Volatility (lowest and Momentum relate to the performance of the security rather than its fundamentals.  Our recent CPD webinar explores factor-based investing in more detail.
  3. Risk-based: probably the least developed area.  Risk-based investing weights securities by their relationship to each other in order to target a particular target risk characteristic.  Examples include: Max Deconcentration (aka Equal weighted); Max Diversification; Max Decorrelation; Max Sharpe; Min Variance, Risk Parity (aka Equal Risk Contribution) and Managed Risk.  Our recent CPD webinar explores risk-based investing in more detail.
  4. Min Volatility or Min Variance? What’s the difference? Semantics, but for differentiation, we refer to Min Volatility when a strategy ranks securities by their volatility, to include only those lowest volatility stocks (hence used when referring to Factor-based strategies).  We refer to Min Variance when a strategy looks at risk and correlation structure between stocks to target a “minimum variance portfolio” of those securities (hence used when referring to Risk-based strategies).  So similar, but different.
With that array of index methodologies for US equities to choose from, there’s no excuse for complaining about being fed-up with the traditional cap-weighted approach.  Index selection, depends, of course, on portfolio construction objectives, and index methodology due diligence remains key.

How have US equity risk-based strategies fared?
Risk-based strategies have been in existence for some time, so we are able now to consider 10 year data (to December 2020, in USD terms).  In terms of risk-adjusted performance, Managed Risk index strategies have fared best, whilst Min Variance has delivered higher returns for similar levels of risk of a Max Diversification strategy.  Meanwhile Equal Weight has actually exhibited greater risk than traditional cap-weighted approach.
Picture
In this respect, Equal Weight (Max Deconcentration), also disappoints delivering higher beta and >95% correlation.  Likewise Min Variance, whilst delivering on Beta reduction, does not deliver on decorrelation.  Max Diversification delivers somewhat on decorrelating the strategy from the S&P500, but only modestly, whilst Managed Risk achieves similar decorrelation, reduced beta and better returns.  Finally Risk Parity 10% Volatility cap has delivered most decorrelation as well as beta reduction.
For more information about the indices and funds used to represent these different strategies, please contact us.
​
Summary
There are a broad range of alternatives to cap-weighted index exposures.  But consideration of style-, factor- or risk-based objectives will necessarily inform portfolio construction.
  • Fiscal and policy support should keep growth shock short and sharp
  • Inflation looks bottled – for now, but this is the key focus
  • Asset price recovery was welcome but vigilance now required
 
Find out more
For more insights and information on research, portfolios and indices, visit:
www.elstonsolutions.co.uk or NH ETF<Go>

Surfing the cycle with sector ETFs

7/2/2019

 
Picture
  • Different companies behave differently over the economic cycle
  • Sectors group companies by communal characteristics
  • Investors can adjust exposure to different sectors to reflect the changing economic outlook

Sectors: walking or just talking?

Most portfolio managers discuss markets within the context of the economic cycle.  And no wonder: the main drivers of market performance – growth, inflation and interest rates – are not constants but fluctuate with the economic cycle.
Managers point to their stock selection decisions because a particular company is seen as “cyclical” or “defensive”.  In theory, cyclical companies do relatively better when the economy is expanding.  Defensive companies do relatively better when the economy is slowing or contracting.
But despite talking the talk on sectors when analysing the economic outlook, it’s harder to judge whether or not managers are walking the walk when it comes to sector investing.
If your portfolio manager is not providing a sector allocation in their reporting back, perhaps ask for one.

What exactly is a sector?
A sector is a group of companies which provide the same or related product or service.  The most broadly use classification system is the Global Industry Classification Standard (“GICS”) which categorises companies into 11 distinct sectors.  GICS further defines 69 industry types that fall within each of those sectors.

Cyclical or Defensive?
When a company’s earnings are dependent on or more correlated with the broader economic business cycle, they are “cyclical”.  When a company’s earnings are independent of or less correlated with the broader economic business cycle, they are defensive as in theory are less impacted by downswings in the economy.
The list of sectors includes sectors considered “cyclical” such as: Communication Services, Consumer Discretionary, Financials, Industrials, Materials, and Technology; and sectors considered “defensive” sectors such as: Consumer Staples, Energy, Health Care, Utilities and Real Estate.

Sector indices
Sector indices calculate the performance of, typically, the combined market capitalisation of each distinct sector.  In this way we are able to see the performance of each sector at different stages of the economic cycle on a standalone basis, in comparison with other sectors, and relative to the overall equity market.

Why use a sector lense?
By looking both the economy AND the market through a sector lense it is possible to analyse how groups of companies with commonalities as regards their input (expenses) and output (revenues) behave relative to their peers to inform comparisons within each sector, and comparisons between sectors over different time frames.  This helps us understand the impact the economy has on sector-specific drivers, and which sectors could be in favour or out of favour at different stages of the economic cycle.

Understanding the economic cycle
The economic cycle (a.k.a business cycle) is the fluctuation in economic growth rates over time as measured by real (inflation adjusted) Gross Domestic Product as measured by national statistic offices.
The economic cycle can be broken down into two broad states: expansion (trend of economic growth) and recession (trend of economic decline).  Expansions are measured from the trough (or bottom) of the previous economic cycle to the peak of the current cycle, while recession is measured from the peak to the trough. The economic is different from the market cycle (the fluctuation of the equity markets over time), although one can impact the other.
 
What drives sector performance?
Economic activity changes at different changes in the cycle.  In periods of expansion, consumers are more likely to increase their non-essential discretionary spending – so Consumer Discretionary should do better.  In periods of recession, consumers are more likely to hunker down and focus only on essential spending – so Consumer Staples and Utilities should do better, for example.  This seems intuitive.
Furthermore, research suggests that more specifically it is the role of monetary policy that really drives sector performance.  Central Banks adapt monetary policy based on the economic cycle.  When monetary policy is easing, cyclical stocks do generally better.  When monetary policy is tightening, defensive stocks generally do better.

Surfing the cycle
Given the economic cycle and monetary policy are in flux, it follows that an investor with a strategic allocation to equities should dynamically allocate to different sectors at different stages of the cycle, rotating from cyclicals to defensives and back again as the economic cycle fluctuates.  This sector rotation strategy can earn “consistent and economically significant excess return while requiring only infrequent rebalancing”.

Accessing sectors
All equities fall within a sector grouping.  Investors must therefore decide whether they wish to construct a portfolio of stocks within each sector or have a fairly concentrated holding within each sector.  For investors that want to maximise diversification within each sector, a sector ETF is a convenient way of accessing targeted and comprehensive exposures to distinct sectors.
​
Sector investing
Whether investing in a particular sector to capitalise on specific sector trends, or seeking to implement a dynamic allocation strategy between sectors over the economic cycle with an equity allocation, sector ETFs offer a low-cost and convenient way of implementing cyclical sector views efficiently and precisely.
  
Notices and Disclaimers:
Disclosure: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours.
Additional disclosure: Recently published Elston ETF Research reports “Sector Equities: 4q18 Update” and “Sector Equities: 4q18 Survey” were sponsored by State Street Global Advisors Limited.  We warrant that the information in this article is presented objectively.  For further information, please refer to important Notices and Disclosures please see our website www.ElstonETF.com
This article has been written for a UK audience. Tickers are shown for corresponding and/or similar ETFs prefixed by the relevant exchange code, e.g. “LON:” (London Stock Exchange) for UK readers. For research purposes/market commentary only, does not constitute an investment recommendation or advice, and should not be used or construed as an offer to sell, a solicitation of an offer to buy, or a recommendation for any product. This article reflects the views of the author and does not necessarily reflect the views of Elston Consulting, its clients or affiliates. For information and disclaimers, please see www.ElstonETF.com
Photo credit: N/A; Chart credit: Elston Consulting; Table credit: Elston Consulting

Sector investing with etfs - UK manager survey

29/1/2019

 
Picture
In December we conducted a Survey of senior portfolio managers and decision makers from firms whose combined assets under management is in excess of £500bn.  The survey was designed to get a better understanding on how those managers approach sector investing.
 
Our key findings based on the survey are summarised below:
  • Sectors may be used more frequently to reflect tactical positioning rather than long-run strategic views.  We interpret this to be consistent with portfolio managers looking to use different sector exposures at different stages of the economic cycle.
  • When investing with sectors, using world equity sector exposures is considered more often than US or European sectors.  We interpret this to reflect the global nature of portfolio managed in London.  We would not necessarily expect the same result for portfolios managed in the US or continental Europe.
  • Portfolio managers may use sector ETFs to implement their views rather than individual stocks.  We interpret this to reflect the desire to access a particular sector at different stages of the economic cycle, while avoiding idiosyncratic risks of security selection.
  • Portfolio managers may use ETFs as much as actively managed funds for implementing sector views.  We were surprised than this higher-than-expected level of adoption.
  • Diversification and efficiency were cited as the key benefits, whilst liquidity was cited a key concern.
For more information and important notices, view the full report.
VIEW REPORT

Sector Investing In Febrile Markets

28/1/2019

 
Picture
  • Amidst market uncertainty, there is a need to consider positioning if required to remain fully invested in equities
  • A sector perspective enables investors to make nuanced adjustments to their equity portfolio
  • Consumer Staples provide lower volatility and Utilities provide reduced correlation relative to World Equity Markets

Anywhere to hide?
For investors with a broad mandate, asset allocation decisions between equities, alternatives, bonds and cash and equivalents gives scope to limit the impact of market volatility.
But what about for mandates which necessarily must remain fully invested in equities.
Within the equity sleeve, we believe a sector perspective enables investors to make nuanced adjustments to their equity portfolio.

Lower volatility
On a one year basis, the lowest volatility sector is Consumer Staples with a volatility of 11.6% compared to 13.3% for World Equities.  Consumer Staples is nonetheless 75.1% correlated to world equities.

Potential Diversifier
Over the last two years, Utilities has shown both lowest beta (0.52) and lowest correlation (52.8%) to world equities.  This makes the Utilities sector a potential diversifier within a portfolio context. 

Chasing growth?
From a momentum perspective, Technology remains the strongest performing sector with an annualised return over 3 years of +20.2% (in GBP terms).

Conclusion
Whilst economic outlook remains key driver for sector-based performance, the current volatility and correlation characteristics of specific sectors are informative from a portfolio construction perspective.


Source: Elston Research, Bloomberg. Indices used: MSCI World Index and MSCI World sector index data
Notes: Volatility: annualised 260 day volatility to 31-Dec-18; Correlation: 2 year correlation of daily returns to 31-Dec-18; all data expressed in GBP terms.

​Notices and Disclaimers:
Disclosure: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours.
Additional disclosure: The data in this article comes from an Elston ETF Research report “Sector Equities: 4q18 Update” that was sponsored by State Street Global Advisors Limited.  We warrant that the information in this article is presented objectively.  For further information, please refer to important Notices and Disclosures in that Report which is available on our website www.ElstonETF.com
This article has been written for a UK audience. Tickers are shown for corresponding and/or similar ETFs prefixed by the relevant exchange code, e.g. “LON:” (London Stock Exchange) for UK readers. For research purposes/market commentary only, does not constitute an investment recommendation or advice, and should not be used or construed as an offer to sell, a solicitation of an offer to buy, or a recommendation for any product. This article reflects the views of the author and does not necessarily reflect the views of Elston Consulting, its clients or affiliates. For information and disclaimers, please see www.ElstonETF.com
Photo credit: N/A; Chart credit: Elston Consulting; Table credit: Elston Consulting

4q18: sector equities performance update

24/1/2019

 
  1. Sector Equities performance was highly divergent in 2018 in World, US and European markets.
  2. Technology remains strongest performer on 3 year view for World and US markets.
  3. For diversification purposes, Utilities remains the lowest correlation sector in World, US and European markets.
For more information and important notices, view the full report
Picture
VIEW REPORT

    ELSTON RESEARCH

    insights inform solutions

    Get our weekly newsletter

    Categories

    All
    All Weather Portfolio
    Alternative Assets
    Alternative Strategies
    Bonds
    Business Practice
    Equity Income
    Equity Sectors
    ESG
    ETFs
    Evidence Based Investing
    Factor Investing
    Gold & Precious Metals
    Guide To Investing
    Index Investing
    Inflation
    Macro
    MULTI ASSET
    Multi Asset Income
    Net Zero
    Permanent Portfolio
    Portfolio Construction
    Private Markets
    Real Assets
    Retirement Investing
    Risk Parity
    Thematic Investing
    Value Factor

    Archives

    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    September 2019
    June 2019
    April 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    July 2017
    May 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    June 2015
    January 2014
    June 2012

    RSS Feed

Company

Home
About
Terms of Use
​​​Contact
​
​Events
​
Press

Solutions

​​Insights
​​​Research Service
​Research Library
Portfolio Analytics
​Our Portfolios
Custom Portfolios
​Retirement Portfolio
Our Funds
Custom Funds
​Retirement Funds
Our Indices
​Custom Indices
Retirement Indices

Services

CIRP Development
Regulatory Research
​
​​CPD

By client type:
For Advisers
For Discretionary Managers
​For Asset Managers
For Asset Owners


© COPYRIGHT 2012-23. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
  • WHO WE ARE
    • About
    • Contact
    • Events
    • Press
  • WHAT WE DO
    • Portfolio Solutions >
      • Our Portfolios
      • Custom Portfolios
    • Fund Solutions >
      • Our Funds
      • Custom Funds
    • Index Solutions >
      • Our indices
      • Custom Indices
    • SPECIALIST STRATEGIES >
      • Money Market Funds
      • Retirement Income Solutions
      • Retirement Portfolios
      • Adaptive Portfolios
      • UK Equity Income
      • Multi-Asset Income
      • Liquid Real Assets
      • Dynamic Risk Parity
      • Gold and Precious Metals
      • Enabling Net Zero
    • Supporting Advisers >
      • Investment Committee Support
      • Regulatory Support
    • CPD
  • WHO WE HELP
    • Financial Advisers
    • Discretionary Managers
    • Fund Providers
  • Insights