Elston
  • WHO WE ARE
    • About
    • Contact
    • Events
    • Press
  • WHAT WE DO
    • Portfolio Solutions >
      • Our Portfolios
      • Custom Portfolios
      • Research Portfolios
    • Fund Solutions >
      • Our Funds
      • Custom Funds
    • Index Solutions >
      • Our indices
      • Custom Indices
    • SPECIALIST STRATEGIES >
      • Liquid Real Assets
      • UK Equity Income
      • Permanent Portfolio UK
      • All Weather Portfolio UK
      • Dynamic Risk Parity
      • Gold and Precious Metals
      • Enabling Net Zero
    • Research >
      • Investment Research
      • Regulatory Research
    • CPD
  • WHO WE HELP
    • Financial Advisers
    • Discretionary Managers
    • Asset Managers
    • Asset Owners
    • 中文
  • Insights

Insights.

2016 in review: Quant strategies are cheaper and smarter than opaque hedge funds

19/1/2017

0 Comments

 
Picture
  • 2016 outcomes for our multi-asset Max Sharpe and Min Volatility did what they say on the tin.
  • Dynamic risk-based strategies can provide low correlation differentiated returns to provide a low-cost, liquid alternative to traditional "Alternatives"
  • A quant-based approach to alternative investing is likely to be cheaper and smarter than hedge funds which are vulnerable to manager's behavioural and emotional biases

Smart beta strategies are “smart” because they take a scientific, quantitative and objective approach to investing by combining a range of index-tracking ETFs with different market risk or “beta” exposures.

In contrast to the opacity of hedge funds, dynamic allocation “smart beta” investment strategies should do what they say on the tin.

Elston runs a number of diversified multi-asset investment strategies, two of which have been offered as indices for asset owners and investment managers to benchmark against or track.

Chart 1: Risk and Return 2016
Picture
Source: Elston, Bloomberg, all in GBP

Looking at outcomes
Our  multi-asset Global Max Sharpe index (Bloomberg: ESBGMS) did what it said on the tin delivering a Sharpe ratio (our primary measure of success for this strategy) of 2.06 for 2016, compared to 1.94 for Equities, 1.90 for Bonds and 1.45 for Commodities.  On a returns basis (our secondary measure of success) the strategy returned 23.58% for the year, compared to 28.35% for equities, but with volatility of 10.35% compared to 15.45% for equities.  Put differently, the strategy captured 83% of equity returns with just 67% of equity risk. 

Chart 2: Elston Multi-Asset Max Sharpe (ESBGMS) 2016 Outcome
Picture
Source: Elston, Bloomberg, all in GBP

Our multi-asset Global Min Volatility index (Bloomberg: ESBGMV) also did what it said on the tin whilst maintaining exposure to a broad set of return-seeking asset classes.  The realised volatility (our primary measure of success for this strategy) for 2016 was 7.08%, compared to 15.45% for equities, 13.64% for bonds and 25.28% for commodities.  Our dynamic asset allocation approach minimised portfolio variance whilst harvesting returns. On a returns basis (our secondary measure of success), the strategy returned 18.62% for the year, compared to 28.35% for equities, but with volatility of 7.08% compared to 15.45% for equities.  Put differently, the strategy captured 66% of equity returns with just 46% of equity risk.
​

​Chart 3: Elston Multi-Asset Min Volatility (ESBGMV) 2016 Outcome
Picture
Source: Elston, Bloomberg, all in GBP

Theory and practice
Our strategies constituent parts are ETFs representing a broad range of asset classes and geographies.  The Sharpe of our Global Max Sharpe strategy’s whole is greater than the sum of its constituent parts.  The Volatility of our Global Min Volatility strategy’s whole is less than the sum of its constituent parts.  And that’s the intention. 

A low cost more consistent alternative to hedge funds?
Hedge funds were popular because they provided differentiated returns and mitigated risk.  In 2016, Hedge Funds returned 1.35% with volatility of 3.56%.  Put differently, on average they captured just 5% equity returns, despite taking on 23% of equity risk.

We plot out equity return capture (return relative to global equity return) and risk outlay (volatility relative to global equity volatility) for the main asset classes, our strategies and HFRX (all in GBP) in the summary matrix below.

​
Chart 4: 2016 Return Capture vs Risk Outlay
Picture
Source: Elston, Bloomberg

The problem with many hedge funds is that they are not doing what they say on the tin.  They aim to provide diversified differentiated returns – but their process, statistically, amounts to trial and error, fraught with subjective bias.  We seek to achieve similar outcomes, but using a clinically quantitative approach.  To paraphrase a famous composer: “At the end of the day, it’s just maths.”

What next?
The Elston Strategic Beta multi-asset indexes were launched in December 2014. They are priced daily with index values available for free, factsheets are published daily.  Our research strategies and indices are available for licensing.
0 Comments

    ELSTON RESEARCH

    insights inform solutions

    Get our weekly newsletter

    Categories

    All
    All Weather Portfolio
    Alternative Assets
    Alternative Strategies
    Bonds
    Business Practice
    Equity Income
    Equity Sectors
    ESG
    ETFs
    Evidence-Based Investing
    Factor Investing
    Gold & Precious Metals
    Guide To Investing
    Index Investing
    Inflation
    Macro
    MULTI ASSET
    Multi Asset Income
    Net Zero
    Permanent Portfolio
    Portfolio Construction
    Private Markets
    Real Assets
    Retirement Investing
    Risk Parity
    Value Factor

    Archives

    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    September 2019
    June 2019
    April 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    July 2017
    May 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016

    RSS Feed

Company

Home
About
Terms of Use
​​​Contact
​
​Events
​
Press

Solutions

​​Insights
​​​Research Service
​Research Library
Portfolio Analytics
​Our Portfolios
Custom Portfolios
​Retirement Portfolio
Our Funds
Custom Funds
​Retirement Funds
Our Indices
​Custom Indices
Retirement Indices

Services

CIRP Development
Regulatory Research
​
​​CPD

By client type:
For Advisers
For Discretionary Managers
​For Asset Managers
For Asset Owners


© COPYRIGHT 2012-21. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
  • WHO WE ARE
    • About
    • Contact
    • Events
    • Press
  • WHAT WE DO
    • Portfolio Solutions >
      • Our Portfolios
      • Custom Portfolios
      • Research Portfolios
    • Fund Solutions >
      • Our Funds
      • Custom Funds
    • Index Solutions >
      • Our indices
      • Custom Indices
    • SPECIALIST STRATEGIES >
      • Liquid Real Assets
      • UK Equity Income
      • Permanent Portfolio UK
      • All Weather Portfolio UK
      • Dynamic Risk Parity
      • Gold and Precious Metals
      • Enabling Net Zero
    • Research >
      • Investment Research
      • Regulatory Research
    • CPD
  • WHO WE HELP
    • Financial Advisers
    • Discretionary Managers
    • Asset Managers
    • Asset Owners
    • 中文
  • Insights