Elston supports UK financial advisers CIP/CRP/MPS
  • WHO WE ARE
    • About
    • Our Journey
  • WHAT WE DO
    • Elston Portfolios >
      • Our Portfolios
      • Adaptive Portfolios
      • Retirement Portfolios
      • Sustainable Portfolios
      • Multi-Asset Income
      • All Weather Portfolio UK
      • Money Market Portfolio
    • Custom Portfolios >
      • Custom Portfolios
    • CGT Solutions >
      • Our CGT Solutions
      • GIA Portfolios
      • Onshore Bonds
      • Direct Gilts
    • Adviser Support >
      • Our Adviser Support
      • CIRP
      • Investment Committee Support
      • Regulatory Support
      • Analytics, Factsheets & Reporting
      • CPD
    • Fund Solutions >
      • Our Funds
      • Custom Funds
    • Index Solutions >
      • Our Indices
      • Sector Equal Weight
      • UK Equity Income
      • Liquid Real Assets
      • Gold and Precious Metals
      • Custom Indices
  • WHO WE HELP
    • Financial Advisers
    • Discretionary Managers
  • Insights
  • Contact

Asset Allocation Research for UK Advisers

UK regulator names, shames and imposes £1.9m fine on closet index manager

21/11/2019

 
  • Second fine by UK regulator for high-charging “closet index funds”
  • Fund manager and specific funds named for first time
  • Manager failed to communicate change of strategy with retail investors and left fees high

What just happened?
The UK’s financial services watchdog, the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has fined Henderson Investment Funds Limited, the fund provider that is now part of Janus Henderson, £1.9m ($2.5m) for “failing to treat fairly more than 4,500 retail investors in two of its funds.”

The funds named are the Henderson Japan Enhanced Equity Fund and the Henderson North American Enhanced Equity Fund, which had been originally set up and marketed as actively managed funds.

In November 2011, the funds’ appointed manager Henderson Global Investors Limited decided to reduce the level of active management of these funds – effectively making them more similar to a passively-managed tracker fund.

Who was affected?
While this change of strategy was communicated to institutional investors, who were also offered fees to be reduced to zero, there was no such communication or fee adjustment for the 4,713 direct retail investors (who represented 5% of fund value by AUM), and 75 intermediary companies (for example, financial advisers) who remained invested in those funds. 

How long did this go on for?
This discrepancy continued between November 2011 and August 2016, Henderson allowed this discrepancy to continue with retail investors seeing no change in prospectus, objectives or fee levels while the fund was deliberately reposition to a more passive-style strategy: effectively Henderson wilfully converted two of its funds into closet index funds, but just didn’t tell its retail clients.

What was performance like during this period?
The charts below show the performance of each fund between November 2011 and August 2016.  The charts show the funds underperforming the index owing to active fees which creates heavier and heavier drag.

​Henderson Japan Enhanced Equity
 (old name)
Picture
Source: Bloomberg, GBP terms, monthly data, vs selected ​ index 
Henderson North American Enhanced Equity (old name)
Picture
Source: Bloomberg, GBP terms, monthly data, vs selected index 

What happened after 2016?
Based on our research, in 2016, the two offending funds were renamed.  The Henderson Japan Enhanced Equity became the Henderson Institutional Japan Index Opportunities fund.  The Henderson North American Enhanced Equity became the Henderson Institutional North American Index Opportunities.  The retail AMC on these funds was reduced from 1.50% to 0.50%.  Information on the two funds is presented in the table below.

Fund particulars
Picture

Note: Old name and old retail AMC is pre 2016 changes.  New name, new retail AMC and new OCF is as at April 2019. AUM as at November 2019.
Source: See fund provider data for each fund here and here

Fined for being a closet index fund?
The fine is for not treating customers fairly, because for retail clients the change in strategy was not communicated and fees were left unchanged. This contrasts to the treatment of institutional clients, where changes were communicated and fees were offered to be waived.  The fine is therefore for leaving retail investors thinking they were invested in active fund even though it had – deliberately – become a closet tracker.

Is the first fine for closet indexing in the UK?
No, the FCA led the way in 2018 and issued the first fine in Europe for closet index funds, fining a number of unnamed fund houses £34m to compensate clients invested in closet index funds.
What’s different this time is that both the manager and the specific funds have been “named and shamed”.

How can you tell if an active fund is a closet tracker
There are a number of metrics used such as active share, tracking error and R-squared that have been set out by ESMA.  On that basis, between 5-15% of all funds offered in Europe could be deemed closet index funds.

How was the fine worked out?
The total fine was £2.7m, based on £5.8m revenues during the period, but a 30% discount was applied based on Henderson’s cooperation resulting in a £1.9m fine.  £1.8m of this fine represents compensation to affected clients, based on the difference in fees paid by retail investor between the two Henderson funds and similar passive products.

How can we evaluate a “closet index” fund?
There is no defined formula for evaluating a closet index fund.  Some measures look at active share, others at a combination of active share, tracking error and correlation.
In our view, a closet index fund will have zero or negative alpha, a beta to its index that is close to 1.0x and a high correlation between the fund and the index.
Negative alpha means the fund underperforms the index.  Beta close to 1.0x means that the fund moves in tandem with the index.  Correlation close to 100% means the behaviour of the fund is similar to the index.
In terms of similarity to the index, we can see the following metrics for the period under review:

Henderson Japan Enhanced Equity (old name)
Alpha: -0.198%
Beta: 1.033
Correlation: 95.6%
Source: Elston research, Bloomberg data, 1-Nov-11 to 31-Aug-16, monthly data

Henderson North American Enhanced Equity (old name)
Alpha: -0.137%
Beta: 1.052
Correlation: 90.0%
Source: Elston research, Bloomberg data, 30-Nov-11 to 31-Aug-16, monthly data

Investor awareness
The fines are helping to increase investor awareness of the closet indexing issue, and we expect long-only retail active managers to remain under scrutiny.

Find out more
Read the FCA’s final notice
 
Disclosure: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it. I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.
 
Additional disclosure: Additional disclosure: This article has been written for a UK audience. Tickers are shown for corresponding and/or similar ETFs prefixed by the relevant exchange code, e.g. “NYSEARCA:” (NYSE Arca Exchange) or “LON:” (London Stock Exchange). For research purposes/market commentary only, does not constitute an investment recommendation or advice, and should not be used or construed as an offer to sell, a solicitation of an offer to buy, or a recommendation for any product. This blog reflects the views of the author and does not necessarily reflect the views of Elston Consulting, its clients or affiliates. For information and disclaimers, please see www.elstonconsulting.co.uk Photo credit: as per specified source; Chart credit: as per specified source; Table credit: as per specified source. All product names, logos, and brands are property of their respective owners. All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. Use of these names, logos, and brands does not imply endorsement.

    ELSTON RESEARCH

    insights inform solutions

    Get our weekly newsletter

    Categories

    All
    All Weather Portfolio
    Alternative Assets
    Alternative Strategies
    Bonds
    Business Practice
    Capital Market Assumptions
    CPD
    Direct Gilts
    Equities
    Equity Income
    Equity Sectors
    ESG
    ETFs
    Evidence Based Investing
    Factor Investing
    Geopolitics
    Gold & Precious Metals
    Guide To Investing
    Index Investing
    Inflation
    Investment Trusts
    Macro
    MULTI ASSET
    Multi Asset Income
    Net Zero
    Outlook
    Permanent Portfolio
    Podcast
    Portfolio Construction
    Private Markets
    Real Assets
    Retirement Investing
    Risk Parity
    Thematic Investing
    Value Factor
    Video

    Archives

    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    September 2019
    June 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    July 2017
    May 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    August 2015
    June 2015
    January 2014
    June 2012

    RSS Feed

Company
Home
About
​Our Journey
​​​Contact
Terms of Use
​Our Solutions
​​Insights
​Our Portfolios
Custom Portfolios
​Retirement Portfolios
Our CGT Solutions
Our Funds
Custom Funds
Our Indices
Custom Indices
​Adviser Support
CIRP
Investment Committee Support
Regulatory Support
Analytics, Factsheets & Reporting
CPD


By client type:
For Advisers
For Discretionary Managers


© COPYRIGHT 2012-25. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
 Elston Consulting Limited (Company Registration Number 07125478) is registered in
England & Wales, Registered address:  1 King William Street, London EC4N 7AF
  • WHO WE ARE
    • About
    • Our Journey
  • WHAT WE DO
    • Elston Portfolios >
      • Our Portfolios
      • Adaptive Portfolios
      • Retirement Portfolios
      • Sustainable Portfolios
      • Multi-Asset Income
      • All Weather Portfolio UK
      • Money Market Portfolio
    • Custom Portfolios >
      • Custom Portfolios
    • CGT Solutions >
      • Our CGT Solutions
      • GIA Portfolios
      • Onshore Bonds
      • Direct Gilts
    • Adviser Support >
      • Our Adviser Support
      • CIRP
      • Investment Committee Support
      • Regulatory Support
      • Analytics, Factsheets & Reporting
      • CPD
    • Fund Solutions >
      • Our Funds
      • Custom Funds
    • Index Solutions >
      • Our Indices
      • Sector Equal Weight
      • UK Equity Income
      • Liquid Real Assets
      • Gold and Precious Metals
      • Custom Indices
  • WHO WE HELP
    • Financial Advisers
    • Discretionary Managers
  • Insights
  • Contact