Elston
  • WHO WE ARE
    • About
    • Contact
    • Events
    • Press
  • WHAT WE DO
    • Portfolio Solutions >
      • Our Portfolios
      • Custom Portfolios
      • Research Portfolios
    • Fund Solutions >
      • Our Funds
      • Custom Funds
    • Index Solutions >
      • Our indices
      • Custom Indices
    • SPECIALIST STRATEGIES >
      • Liquid Real Assets
      • UK Equity Income
      • Permanent Portfolio UK
      • All Weather Portfolio UK
      • Dynamic Risk Parity
      • Gold and Precious Metals
      • Enabling Net Zero
    • Research >
      • Investment Research
      • Regulatory Research
    • CPD
  • WHO WE HELP
    • Financial Advisers
    • Discretionary Managers
    • Asset Managers
    • Asset Owners
    • 中文
  • Insights

Insights.

Nowhere to hide: bonds provide no protection

8/4/2022

0 Comments

 
Picture
[5 min read, open as pdf for full article]

  • All type of bond exposure showed negative returns in 1q22
  • Rising rates and inflation means bond values remain under pressure
  • Bonds are providing neither stability nor diversification
 
Equity markets endured a triple shock in the first quarter of 2022: a dramatic steepening of the likely path of interests, multi-year high inflation levels and a horrific war unleased in Ukraine.
The traditional rational for including nominal bonds was to provide steady income, lower but positive returns, and diversification – a place of safety in periods of market stress.
In face of rising inflation and rising interest rates, nominal bonds are providing none of these portfolio functions.
Indeed in 1q22 not a single bond exposure delivered positive returns, and over 12 months only inflation-linked exposures delivered positive returns.

 Open as pdf for full article
​CPD Webinar Alternatives to Bonds in a Portfolio

0 Comments

Building an all-weather portfolio with ETFs

4/3/2022

0 Comments

 
Picture
[5 min read, open as pdf]

Find out more on this topic in our upcoing CPD webinar

  • 60/40 portfolios are under pressure with rising rates and inflation
  • An Equal Risk “all-weather” portfolio provides true diversification
  • An Equal Weight “permanent” portfolio provides resilience
 
For investors with long time horizons who want an all-equity portfolio, there is no shortage of low- cost global equity ETFs.  In cricketing terms, when sunshine’s guaranteed, a grass pitch works just fine.
But when time horizons are shorter and risk control matters more – as in these uncertain times - a multi-asset approach might make better sense.  Put differently, when the weather is changeable or extreme, an all-weather pitch makes more sense.
It’s the same for investments.  In these times of market volatility, rising interest rates and inflation pressure, we explore three different types of multi-asset strategy: the 60/40 portfolio, the “Equal Risk” or all-weather portfolio, and the “Equal Weight” or Permanent Portfolio.

The problem with 60/40
The traditional multi-asset portfolio is the so-called “60/40” portfolio – where 60% is invested in equities, and 40% is invested in bonds.  This is the “classic” multi-asset strategy.  The idea being that you can combine higher risk and return from equities with lower risk income from bonds.  A 60/40 portfolio can be constructed with just two ETFs.  60% in a global equity ETF like SSAC (iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF) or VWRP (Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF); and 40% in a bond ETF – for example AGBP (iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP hedged) for those wanting global bond (hedged to GBP) exposure, or IGLT (iShares Core UK Gilts UCITS ETF) for those wanting UK government bond exposure.  Or you can make it more and more granular.
But this traditional 60/40 model is under pressure, and the suggestion currently is that the 60/40 portfolio is now “dead”.  Why is this?  Well because for the last 30 years or so, we’ve lived in a world where inflation and interest rates have been trending down – which is doubly good for bonds.  But now we are now in an economic regime where both interest rates and inflation are starting to trend up – which is doubly bad for bonds. 
The other problem with 60/40, is that in times of market stress, the correlation between equities and bonds increases, meaning that bonds lack the diversifying power they may have had in the historical long-run, at a time when it is needed most.
In summary: the advantage of this approach a 60/40 portfolio is easy to construct, and is a classic “balanced” portfolio.  The disadvantage of this approach is that bonds are facing an uphill struggle for the next few years, so may not be as “balanced” as you would want.

The all-weather portfolio
The all-weather portfolio concept is that of a multi-asset portfolio that is designed to deliver resilient, consistent performance in different market regimes, or “whatever the weather”.  The term and idea was pioneered by Ray Dalio of Bridgewater Associates (which was established in 1974, shortly after Nixon took the US Dollar off the gold standard) and is designed to answer the question: “What kind of investment portfolio would you hold that would perform well across all environments, be it a devaluation or something completely different?”[1].  Dalio and Bridgewater’s all-weather portfolio assumes equal odds of any of four market regimes (rising/falling growth/inflation) prevailing at any time.  This approach created and pioneered what is also referred to as a “Risk Parity” approach to investing.
The concept of risk parity requires some additional explanation.  A classic 60/40 equity/bond allocation results in a portfolio where over 95% of overall portfolio risk comes from the equity position, and the balance comes from the bond position.  In short, the asset allocation drives portfolio risk, and while a portfolio may be balanced in terms of asset allocation, it is imbalanced in terms of risk allocation.  Risk parity reverses the maths: it means that each asset class contributes equally to the overall risk of a portfolio.  This is why it is also known as an “Equal Risk” approach.  But as risk is dynamic, not stable, the asset weights must adapt to keep the risk allocation stable.
UK investors can build their own all-weather portfolio using four to six ETFs representing broad asset classes: global equities, UK equities, gilts, property, gold and cash equivalent, depending on complexity.  In order to keep the risk allocation stable, the asset weights might need to change each month to reflect the changing risk and correlation relationships of and between those asset classes. 
In summary: the advantage of this Equal Risk approach is that a portfolio is truly diversified from a risk contribution perspective.  The disadvantage of this approach is it requires a regular change of weights to reflect changing short-term volatilities and correlations.

The Permanent Portfolio
The permanent portfolio is a concept pioneered by the late Harry Browne, a US financial adviser, in his 1999 book “Fail-Safe Investing”.  It has many adherents in both the US and the UK, but to date it is only really in the US that one can find ‘Permanent Portfolios’ on offer, something UK investors seem keen to change. 
The concept is similar to the all-weather portfolio, but in a more straightforward format.  Rather than trying to target an “Equal Risk” contribution with changing asset-class weights, the Permanent Portfolio is a simple Equal Weight approach to four main asset classes to reflect different market regimes, so that whatever the regime, the portfolio has got it covered.
Browne outlines four market regimes[2], and related asset exposure for that regime:
  1. Prosperity: growing economy, falling rates: equities (and also bonds) are best assets to hold
  2. Inflation: inflation is rising moderately, rapidly or at a runaway rate: gold is best asset to hold
  3. Tight money or recession: slowing money supply and recession: cash (or equivalent) is best asset to hold
  4. Deflation: prices decline and purchasing power of money grows: bonds are best asset to hold
An equal-weight portfolio therefore consists of 25% equities, 25% bonds, 25% gold and 25% cash (or cash equivalents to earn some interest).  Browne advocates reviewing this portfolio once per annum, and if necessary rebalancing the allocations to their strategic equal weights.
US versions of this strategy use US equities for the equity exposure and US treasuries for the bond exposure.  So what would a UK version look like?
We constructed a Permanent Portfolio for UK investors using 4 London listed ETFs: SSAC for global equities, IGLT for UK bonds, SGLN (iShares Physical Gold ETC) for gold and ERNS (iShares GBP Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF) for cash equivalents for some additional yield over cash that will capture rising interest rates.
In summary: the advantage of this Equal Weight approach is its simplicity and low-level of maintenance required.  The disadvantage of this approach is that it disregards short-run changes in volatility and correlation that are captured in the Equal Risk approach.

How do they all compare?
Obviously the strategies vary from each other.  To evaluate performance, we have created research portfolios for both these strategies. What becomes apparent is that the outperformance of these low-cost, equal-risk and equal-weight all-weather and permanent portfolios looks relatively attractive when set against many more complex (and expensive) “all-weather” absolute return funds.

Find out more about our All-Weather Portfolio of ETFs for UK investors.
Find out more about our Permanent Portfolio of ETFs for UK investors.
See all our Research Portfolios
Attend our CPD webinar on this topic

[1] https://www.bridgewater.com/research-and-insights/the-all-weather-story
[2] Harry Browne, Fail-Safe Investing, (1999) Rule #11 Build a bullet-proof portfolio for protection (pp.38-49)
0 Comments

Adapting portfolios for inflation

4/2/2022

0 Comments

 
Picture
[5 min read, open as pdf]

In our 2022 outlook, we explained why inflation will remain hotter for longer and will settle above pre-pandemic levels.  Advisers should consider how to adapt portfolios for inflation across each asset class – equities, bonds and alternatives.  Research demonstrates how different asset classes exhibit different degrees of inflation protection over different time-frames.  Equities therefore provide a long-term inflation hedge.
  • Short- to Medium-term:    rate-sensitive assets, commodities
  • Medium- to Long-term:     real estate, equities and inflation-linked
  • Long-term                             equities

In this article, we explore how to adapt portfolios for inflation within and across each asset class: Equities, Bonds and Alternatives.

For full article, read as pdf
0 Comments

Risk-weighted strategies: 4q20 update

29/1/2021

0 Comments

 
Picture
[7 min read, open as pdf for full report]
[See CPD webinar on risk-weighted diversification]

  • We look at latest performance for multi-asset risk-weighted strategies
  • A 60/40 portfolio remains 97% correlated with global equities
  • Risk Parity delivers highest risk-adjusted returns and greatest decorrelation

The challenge
A 60/40 portfolio delivers asset-based diversification: it represents a mix between equities and bonds.
However although a 60/40 portfolio reduces market beta, it does not provide “true” (risk-based) diversification: for example, a 60/40 portfolio, as represented by the Elston 60/40 GBP Index remains 97% correlated with Global Equities.
​
This problem only increases in stressed markets where correlations between assets increase, as we saw in 2020.

Risk-weighted strategies for “true” diversification
Risk-weighted stratetgies, which represent multi-asset portfolios constructed towards a specific portfolio risk outcome, enable an alternative, differentiated approach to investing and for incorporating "true“diversification”.  We look at the following risk-based strategies in our analysis: Risk Parity, Max Deconcentration, and Min Variance.  These are summarised in more detail in the report.

Comparing asset-weighted vs risk-weighted strategies
How can we compare the efficacy of traditional asset-weighted strategies (e.g. 20%, 40%, and 60% equity/bond strategies), vs these risk-weighted strategies?

One approach would be to compare the efficacy of risk-based strategies vs asset-based strategies from the perspective of 1) capturing equity returns, whilst 2) providing “true” diversification as measured by decorrelation impact (the reduction in correlation relative to global equities).

In summary, the findings are that a Risk Parity strategy captured a similar level of equity returns as a 40% equity strategy, but with almost twice the level of decorrelation, meaning it delivers far greater “true” diversification relative to an asset-weighted strategy with similar return profile.

Over the 5 years to December 2020, a 40% Equity strategy captured 44.3% of global equities annualised returns and delivered a correlation reduction of -22.3%.  By contrast, a Risk Parity strategy captured 48.5% of global equity reutrns, and delivered a decorrelation of -44.8%, relative to global equities.

So for portfolio constructors looking to deliver “true” risk-based diversification, whilst maintaining exposure to risk assets for the potential for returns, incorporating a risk-based strategy such as Risk Parity, Max Deconcentration, or Min Variance could make sense depending on portfolio risk budgets and preferences.

For full quarterly performance update, open as pdf 
0 Comments

    ELSTON RESEARCH

    insights inform solutions

    Get our weekly newsletter

    Categories

    All
    All Weather Portfolio
    Alternative Assets
    Alternative Strategies
    Bonds
    Business Practice
    Equity Income
    Equity Sectors
    ESG
    ETFs
    Evidence-Based Investing
    Factor Investing
    Gold & Precious Metals
    Guide To Investing
    Index Investing
    Inflation
    Macro
    MULTI ASSET
    Multi Asset Income
    Net Zero
    Permanent Portfolio
    Portfolio Construction
    Private Markets
    Real Assets
    Retirement Investing
    Risk Parity
    Value Factor

    Archives

    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    September 2019
    June 2019
    April 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    July 2017
    May 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016

    RSS Feed

Company

Home
About
Terms of Use
​​​Contact
​
​Events
​
Press

Solutions

​​Insights
​​​Research Service
​Research Library
Portfolio Analytics
​Our Portfolios
Custom Portfolios
​Retirement Portfolio
Our Funds
Custom Funds
​Retirement Funds
Our Indices
​Custom Indices
Retirement Indices

Services

CIRP Development
Regulatory Research
​
​​CPD

By client type:
For Advisers
For Discretionary Managers
​For Asset Managers
For Asset Owners


© COPYRIGHT 2012-21. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
  • WHO WE ARE
    • About
    • Contact
    • Events
    • Press
  • WHAT WE DO
    • Portfolio Solutions >
      • Our Portfolios
      • Custom Portfolios
      • Research Portfolios
    • Fund Solutions >
      • Our Funds
      • Custom Funds
    • Index Solutions >
      • Our indices
      • Custom Indices
    • SPECIALIST STRATEGIES >
      • Liquid Real Assets
      • UK Equity Income
      • Permanent Portfolio UK
      • All Weather Portfolio UK
      • Dynamic Risk Parity
      • Gold and Precious Metals
      • Enabling Net Zero
    • Research >
      • Investment Research
      • Regulatory Research
    • CPD
  • WHO WE HELP
    • Financial Advisers
    • Discretionary Managers
    • Asset Managers
    • Asset Owners
    • 中文
  • Insights