Elston
  • WHO WE ARE
    • About
    • Contact
    • Events
    • Press
  • WHAT WE DO
    • Portfolio Solutions >
      • Our Portfolios
      • Custom Portfolios
    • Fund Solutions >
      • Our Funds
      • Custom Funds
    • Index Solutions >
      • Our indices
      • Custom Indices
    • SPECIALIST STRATEGIES >
      • Money Market Funds
      • Retirement Income Solutions
      • Retirement Portfolios
      • Adaptive Portfolios
      • UK Equity Income
      • Multi-Asset Income
      • Liquid Real Assets
      • Dynamic Risk Parity
      • Gold and Precious Metals
      • Enabling Net Zero
    • Supporting Advisers >
      • Investment Committee Support
      • Regulatory Support
    • CPD
  • WHO WE HELP
    • Financial Advisers
    • Discretionary Managers
    • Fund Providers
  • Insights

Insights.

Which multi-asset INDEX fund?

5/6/2020

 
Picture
  • Comparing balanced risk profile / 60% equity allocation multi-asset funds to our “plain vanilla” 60/40 GBP index enables performance insight and analysis
  • Asset allocation design and investment process are key differentiators
  • Architas Multi-Asset Passive range has delivered best risk-adjusted performance, whilst HSBC Global Strategy range offers lowest all-in costs

We analysed 5 year performance of major multi-asset index funds relative to the Elston 60/40 GBP Index to end December 2019, and a YTD update through the COVID-19 impact.

We focused on the following multi-asset index funds* for performance analysis:
Architas Multi-Asset Passive Intermediate fund, BlackRock Consensus 60 fund, HSBC Global Strategy Balanced fund, LGIM Multi-Index 5 fund and Vanguard LifeStrategy 60% Equity fund.

Cumulative Returns
Architas and HSBC have the best performing funds in absolute terms within this group:
Picture
Source: Elston research, Bloomberg data
Notes: Total returns in GBP terms, daily data, as at 31/12/19


Risk-adjusted returns
Within this group, Architas has delivered best risk-adjusted returns within:
Picture
Source: Elston research, Bloomberg data
Notes: Annualised total returns in GBP terms, daily data.  5 year annualised daily volatility data as at 31/12/19


Performance in COVID-19’s “live fire stress-test”
Looking at performance year to date, we see Architas, HSBC and Vanguard delivering performance most consistent with the 60/40 index.  BlackRock Conensus 60 and L&G Multi-Index have delivered least consistent performance relative to this index, underperforming the 60/40 index by -1.81ppt and -2.67ppt respectively.

Obviously those funds’ objectives are specific to each fund and are aiming neither to track nor beat the 60/40 index.  But now we can track the performance of a “no-brainer”** 60/40 portfolio in real-time, it’s easier to see the value that multi-asset index funds add or substract relative to that plain vanilla benchmark.  Multi-asset managers can add value through optimisation, tactical allocation and implementation efficiencies, for example.
Picture
Picture
Source: Elston research, Bloomberg.  As at 29/5/20 total returns basis, GBP terms.

Costs
Ranked by Total Costs and Charges (“TCC”) which represents OCF plus transaction costs, HSBC offers the lowest cost option.
                                OCF                        TCC
HSBC                     0.18%                    0.22%
BlackRock            0.22%                    0.29%
Vanguard            0.22%                    0.26%
LGIM                     0.31%                    0.31%***
Architas                0.47%                    0.48%
Source: manager data, as at end December 2019. ***estimated figure

Value For Money
Architas may look expensive on a TCC basis.  But it has delivered best risk-adjusted performance in the period under review owing to their more dynamic asset allocation approach, so arguably offers good value for money on a risk-adjusted basis.  For static allocation funds, the main differentiator is cost alone, on which basis HSBC offers best value for money, in our view.

A less inappropriate benchmark
Whilst our 60/40 benchmark by default may not be the "perfect" benchmark for these and other (balanced/medium-risk) multi-asset funds, it is certainly a less inappropriate benchmark than comparing a multi-asset fund to a FTSE 100 or Global Equity benchmark.  Whilst individual fund houses may use composites for comparison, these may not be publicly available for analysis.  The existince of a published standardised 60/40 benchmark enables cross-comparison, analysis and insights.

*Fund tickers: ARINTDA, BRC60DA, HSWIPCA, LGMI5IA, VGLS60A respectively.  Index ticker: 6040GBP Index
**Abraham Okusanya's coinage in https://finalytiq.co.uk/cobras-unintended-consequences-multi-asset-funds/​
Kevin Lynch
12/6/2020 14:18:47

A good article.


Comments are closed.

    ELSTON RESEARCH

    insights inform solutions

    Get our weekly newsletter

    Categories

    All
    All Weather Portfolio
    Alternative Assets
    Alternative Strategies
    Bonds
    Business Practice
    Equity Income
    Equity Sectors
    ESG
    ETFs
    Evidence Based Investing
    Factor Investing
    Gold & Precious Metals
    Guide To Investing
    Index Investing
    Inflation
    Macro
    MULTI ASSET
    Multi Asset Income
    Net Zero
    Permanent Portfolio
    Portfolio Construction
    Private Markets
    Real Assets
    Retirement Investing
    Risk Parity
    Thematic Investing
    Value Factor

    Archives

    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    September 2019
    June 2019
    April 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    July 2017
    May 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    June 2015
    January 2014
    June 2012

    RSS Feed

Company

Home
About
Terms of Use
​​​Contact
​
​Events
​
Press

Solutions

​​Insights
​​​Research Service
​Research Library
Portfolio Analytics
​Our Portfolios
Custom Portfolios
​Retirement Portfolio
Our Funds
Custom Funds
​Retirement Funds
Our Indices
​Custom Indices
Retirement Indices

Services

CIRP Development
Regulatory Research
​
​​CPD

By client type:
For Advisers
For Discretionary Managers
​For Asset Managers
For Asset Owners


© COPYRIGHT 2012-23. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
  • WHO WE ARE
    • About
    • Contact
    • Events
    • Press
  • WHAT WE DO
    • Portfolio Solutions >
      • Our Portfolios
      • Custom Portfolios
    • Fund Solutions >
      • Our Funds
      • Custom Funds
    • Index Solutions >
      • Our indices
      • Custom Indices
    • SPECIALIST STRATEGIES >
      • Money Market Funds
      • Retirement Income Solutions
      • Retirement Portfolios
      • Adaptive Portfolios
      • UK Equity Income
      • Multi-Asset Income
      • Liquid Real Assets
      • Dynamic Risk Parity
      • Gold and Precious Metals
      • Enabling Net Zero
    • Supporting Advisers >
      • Investment Committee Support
      • Regulatory Support
    • CPD
  • WHO WE HELP
    • Financial Advisers
    • Discretionary Managers
    • Fund Providers
  • Insights